10/14/2026
Quite frustrating and I am not even sure where to go with my thinking.
In 1713, Hans Carl von Carlowitz wrote Sylvicultura oeconomica. His writing was the first specific mention of sustainability, nachhaltigkeit.
His work was on forest systems. His basic premise was that forest should not be used faster than they could regenerate. Unfortunately they were being consumed at an unsustainable rate.
I tend to apply what many would consider strict definitions to the concepts of sustainability and regenerative.
Recently the USDA deregulated a corn variety genetically engineered to tolerate 5 different herbicides. Synthetic fertilizer will also be used. Farms that plant this variety and use herbicides yet don't till will be considered regenerative.
The winter squash we raise are being naturally bred to resist squash bugs and grown organically with no herbicides, pesticides, synthetic fertilizers, etc.
In no way is this corn sustainable nor fits the new definition of regenerative that isn't directly tied to sustainability.
On my worst days I believe that the USDA hates small farmers but I try not to ascribe malice to ignorance. That said, I don't believe that the corporate capture of the USDA is in total ignorance.
I will continue to grow real food with a consideration of nature and hope that the industrial agriculture changes before much more damage is done.
Industrial agriculture cannot feed the world.
Peace.
Farm Action Real Organic Project U.S. Department of Agriculture