CANTILEVER STUDIO

10/13/2026

Washington Island WI cabin, probable retirement downsizing

10/08/2026

Gonna get ugly

10/08/2026

Pics from my computer screen, bit is the Ironwood Shelter I designed and built at Frank Lloyd Wright School of Architecture, completed in 2000, before graduating with a Masters in Architecture from there. One of those milestones in life that are unforgettable!

09/11/2026

Always fascinated by Nature

09/09/2026

Coming back to this home 8 years after construction for a boathouse, a screen porch addition and a large detached garage across the road. FYI, you have to have some interesting projects happening to have me design a big ass garage, lol

09/03/2026

Why?

The U.S. just approved a w**dkiller linked to cancer for use on American food.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has officially approved the widespread agricultural use of trifludimoxazin, a potent new herbicide designed to target resistant w**ds on major crops like corn, wheat, oats, soybeans, oranges, apples, peanuts, and almonds.

The decision has immediately drawn sharp backlash from environmental advocacy groups, who filed a federal lawsuit to halt its distribution. Critics point out that trifludimoxazin is a perfluoroalkyl or polyfluoroalkyl substance (PFAS)—frequently referred to as a 'forever chemical' because it resists environmental breakdown and can persist in soil and water for years.

Even more concerning to public health advocates is the EPA's own internal finding of 'suggestive evidence' of carcinogenic potential, including thyroid and liver impacts in rodent studies, which they argue was not properly evaluated for its risks to farmworkers and consumers.

Supporters of the chemical's approval argue that such innovative herbicides are vital tools for farmers struggling to manage aggressive w**d species that have developed resistance to existing treatments.

They maintain that modern agricultural yields, and by extension the national food supply, depend on having diverse biochemical tools available. However, opponents counter that spraying highly persistent, toxic biocides directly onto everyday food staples is an unacceptable risk. With the Supreme Court recently curbing the ability of individuals to sue pesticide companies over failure-to-warn health claims, the debate over food safety and chemical regulation has reached a critical boiling point.

As the legal battle moves through the courts, consumers are left asking whether the benefits of crop protection are worth the long-term environmental and biological costs.

source: Attridge, M. (2026). EPA sued over approval of 'forever chemical' pesticide. Courthouse News Service.

09/01/2026

Summer colors to burn the fog off

08/21/2026

Reminiscing about Prague last summer