24/08/2026
A useful tale from Dan here.
A French Property Sale Cancelled Nearly 13 Years Later
This French property case caught my attention for two reasons: what went wrong with the sale, and just how long it took to resolve.
The property was a troglodyte house in Indre-et-Loire, originally a cave.
In 2007, a stability report identified cracks and a potential risk of part of the rock ceiling collapsing. Strengthening work was recommended before the cave was converted into a home.
The property subsequently changed hands and was converted, but the recommended work was apparently never carried out.
In 2011, another couple bought the property for €115,000.
The important detail is that the 2007 report, which had appeared in previous sale documentation, was not attached to their final deed of sale.
Problems later appeared and, in 2015, the buyers went to court to have a judicial expert appointed.
The expert reported in 2017, concluding that the cave should not have been converted into residential accommodation without the recommended strengthening work.
The buyers sought to have the sale cancelled.
Finally, on 26 March 2024, the Orléans Court of Appeal confirmed the cancellation of the sale on the grounds of dol, essentially deliberate concealment or deception.
The estate agency was also held partly responsible. The sellers had apparently supplied the agency with their previous title deed, which included the 2007 report, and the court considered that the agent should have investigated whether the recommended work had actually been carried out.
But what really strikes me is the timeline:
2011: Property purchased
2015: Buyers go to court
2017: Judicial expert reports
2024: Court of Appeal judgment
Nearly 13 years from buying the property to the appeal judgment, and around nine years after the buyers first went to court.
There are lessons here for everyone involved in a French property sale.
For buyers, don't assume that the standard French diagnostic reports cover every possible issue with a property. If something unusual appears in the paperwork, ask questions and, where appropriate, seek specialist advice.
For sellers, previous reports and known problems need to be disclosed.
And for us as estate agents, the case is a useful reminder that our devoir de conseil goes beyond simply passing documents from one person to another. If something significant appears in the history of a property, it may require further questions.
But perhaps the biggest warning is simply this:
A property dispute in France can take a very, very long time to resolve.
Finding and dealing with a question before the compromis is considerably easier than arguing about it in court for the next decade.
(AI-generated image used to illustrate the case.)