Leisure Guard Security - UK ltd

Leisure Guard Security - UK ltd Leisure Guard Security undertakes numerous high profile contracts for private individuals and corpora

Leisure Guard Security undertakes numerous high profile contracts for private individuals and corporate businesses. We supply Static Guards to Retails Guards.Prices From £16.95 P/H

04/09/2026

A business unit can be secure and still be vulnerable if the wider site perimeter has already been breached.

Hampshire and Isle of Wight Constabulary is appealing for information after two people reportedly gained access to Catherington Business Park in Horndean overnight and then forced their way into business premises and storage containers.

More than £4,000 worth of Hilti equipment was stolen, including a core drill, vacuum pump, adaptors, stand and drill bit. Police believe the suspects may have left through fencing to the south of the site.

What stands out to me is that this was not simply a break-in at one unit.

The wider business park had to be accessed first.

Once the perimeter was compromised, the offenders were then able to move between premises and containers looking for valuable equipment.

That is why security around industrial estates and business parks needs to be looked at in layers.

A strong lock on an individual unit matters.

So does the fencing around the site.

So do gates, lighting, CCTV, patrols and checks around storage areas that may sit out of sight overnight.

Tools such as Hilti equipment are valuable, portable and easy to move once access has been gained.

The key question is how long someone can remain inside the wider site before anybody knows they are there.

For me, that is where mobile patrols and perimeter inspections add real value.

They help identify damaged fencing, disturbed gates, forced containers and unusual vehicle or pedestrian activity before one vulnerability becomes several separate break-ins.

The first door the offenders beat may not have belonged to the business at all.

It may have been the perimeter around it.

02/09/2026

Not every theft happens in the middle of the night.

Sometimes the most effective cover is looking like you belong there.

Derbyshire Police recently released images following a theft from Garrard Jones Engineering, where two people reportedly entered the premises at around 7am on a Sunday and stole copper wire.

That timing is what stood out to me. At 7am on an industrial site, people moving around do not necessarily look suspicious.

Vans arrive.
Contractors turn up.
Maintenance teams may be working.
Staff can be coming in early.
And that is exactly why security cannot rely only on whether somebody looks out of place.

The question has to be whether they are actually supposed to be there.

Who authorised the visit?
Does the vehicle match the expected booking?
Is the contractor known?
Does the access time make sense?
And is the activity taking place consistent with what should be happening on site?

That is where gatehouse security, access checks and trained officers add real value. Good security is not about challenging everyone for the sake of it. It is about recognising when something that looks normal on the surface does not quite fit the expected pattern.

Because sometimes the easiest way into a site is not forcing a gate.
It is arriving at a time when nobody thinks to ask why you are there.

01/09/2026

One video can turn a vacant building into a destination.

That is what makes the recent reports from Nottingham’s former Broad Marsh shopping centre so interesting from a security point of view.

Nottinghamshire Police said it had received a number of reports of trespass at the site, while footage circulating on social media appeared to show young people inside the former shopping centre. Homes England, which owns the site, said it was reviewing the footage with its security contractor.

The site is already protected by 24/7 security patrols, CCTV and perimeter fencing, and demolition work is underway as part of the wider regeneration of the area.

But this is the part that stands out to me.

Once footage from inside a vacant or partially demolished building appears online, the risk changes.

People see the route in.
They see what is inside.
And some of them want to go and experience it for themselves.
That can turn a single breach into repeated trespass very quickly.

For property owners and managing agents, this is why vacant-property security cannot be treated as a one-off exercise.

Fencing gets moved.
Panels get damaged.
Doors get forced.
New access routes appear.

And sometimes the first indication that something has changed is a video appearing online.

That is where regular inspections, patrols and good reporting become so important. The aim is not simply to confirm the building is still there. It is to identify whether the security around it has changed before that vulnerability becomes common knowledge.

Because once a vacant site becomes known as somewhere people can get into, getting control of it again can become much harder.

Do you think social media is making urban exploration of vacant buildings a bigger security problem than it used to be?

31/08/2026

A building can be perfectly normal one month and a completely different security risk the next.

The former City of Wolverhampton College Paget Road campus is a good example. The site closed in 2025 when teaching moved to the college’s new City Learning Quarter campus. Since then, the former campus has been earmarked for demolition and redevelopment.

More recently, the vacant site was hit by a fire, and urban explorers have also published footage and photographs from inside the abandoned campus.

That combination should make property owners think. Because once a building becomes vacant, the risks change very quickly.

A damaged access point can become a route in. A route in can become something people share online. And once a vacant building starts attracting explorers, trespassers or antisocial behaviour, the risk of vandalism, theft, accidental injury and fire can increase very quickly.

That is exactly why vacant property inspections matter.

The point is not simply to turn up and confirm that the building is still standing.

It is to look for change.
Has a door been forced?
Has boarding moved?
Are there signs somebody has been inside?
Has fencing been damaged?
Are there new fire risks, water ingress, broken windows or evidence of repeated access?

A vacant property should never be treated as a static risk.

The longer it remains empty, the more important it becomes to understand how the building and the behaviour around it are changing. Because the day the occupants leave is not the day the risk disappears.

Sometimes it is the day a completely different type of risk begins.

27/08/2026

You do not remove £300,000 worth of copper from a factory quietly.

Staffordshire Police recently reported that a burglar has been jailed after an estimated £300,000 worth of copper was stolen from a factory in Tamworth. CCTV showed several people loading the copper from inside the factory onto the back of a nearby truck. One man was later identified through forensic evidence and has now been sentenced.

What stood out to me is the scale of it.
This was not someone slipping a few items into a bag and disappearing. Removing that amount of material takes time. It takes access. It takes a vehicle. It takes loading.

And it raises an important question for any manufacturing or industrial site:
How long could that kind of activity happen before someone noticed?
That is where physical security still matters.

CCTV is valuable, but so are patrols, gatehouse checks, vehicle verification, access control and trained officers who understand what normal activity on a site should look like. Because when a truck is being loaded with high value material, the key question is not just whether it is being recorded. It is whether someone is in a position to recognise that something is wrong while it is still happening.

The police described theft of this magnitude as having far-reaching consequences for businesses, staff and livelihoods. And that is the wider point. The cost is not only the copper. It is the disruption, the investigation, the operational impact and the time spent dealing with everything that follows.

Good industrial security is about spotting unusual activity before it becomes a £300,000 problem.

26/08/2026

Retail crime is not always about one isolated incident in one store.

Often, the same people are moving between locations, targeting different branches and repeating the same behaviour. That is why Asda’s latest rollout caught my attention.

The retailer is introducing the Auror crime reporting and intelligence platform across its entire store estate after a 10-week trial in 30 London stores produced some significant results.

During the pilot, more than £100,000 worth of products were recovered and returned to shelves, crime prevention rates increased by 55%, and the time taken to report an incident fell from around 25 minutes to under five.

What makes the system interesting is that it is not simply another camera.
It brings incident reports, CCTV evidence and offender information together so that repeat and cross-retailer offenders can be identified more quickly and patterns can be spotted sooner.

That is where the real value sits.

A security officer might see one theft.
Another store might see the same person a few days later.
A third location might already have CCTV of the same offender.

When those incidents remain separate, each one can look relatively small. When they are connected, a much bigger picture starts to emerge. Technology can help join those dots.

But it still needs people on the ground to notice the incident, capture good evidence, report it properly and respond appropriately. That combination of security officers, CCTV and shared intelligence is what makes this kind of approach powerful.

Because sometimes the biggest breakthrough is not stopping one incident.
It is realising that it was never just one incident in the first place.

Do you think retailers are finally getting better at sharing intelligence, or is there still too much information sitting in separate systems?

25/08/2026

Hotel security is not just about who comes through the front door. Sometimes the biggest risk comes from what happens at reception.

Travelodge has recently overhauled its room-access security procedures following serious incidents where unauthorised people were given access to guest rooms.

The company now says any additional or replacement room key requires explicit permission from the guest staying in the room, and the new policy has been rolled out across more than 600 hotels. Around 12,000 customer-facing colleagues are being trained on the revised procedures. Travelodge has also completed a deadbolt audit across its UK rooms and brought in external specialists to review and strengthen its approach to safety and security.

The important point is that a hotel room key is not simply a customer-service issue. It is an access-control decision.

Someone may know the guest’s name. They may say they are a partner, relative or friend. They may even sound convincing. But none of that automatically means they should be given access.

That's where clear procedures, trained staff and a strong security presence matter.

In difficult or unusual situations, reception teams need to know when to stop, verify and escalate rather than simply trying to be helpful.mBecause once somebody is given access to a guest room, the consequences can be far more serious than an awkward conversation at reception.

Good hotel security is about making sure the right people get through the right doors. And sometimes the safest answer is simply: No. Not until we have verified it.

Do you think hotels should have stricter controls around replacement room keys and visitor access?

24/08/2026

Retail security is becoming much more intelligent, and Iceland is a very good example of where things are heading.

The retailer has introduced AI technology into its existing CCTV system to help identify suspicious activity as it happens. According to recent reports, the system can detect things like missed scans, partial payments, walkouts at self-checkouts, concealment of products and even people consuming items in-store without paying.

The interesting part is what happens next.

Once a suspicious activity is confirmed, an alert can be sent to staff using handheld devices within around eight seconds, along with images and footage showing the person and their location in the store.

And the results are significant.

Iceland says the technology has helped reduce losses from theft and shrink by 80%, while false alerts have also fallen by around half. Staff are now responding to around 90% of the alerts generated by the system.
This is where retail security becomes really interesting.

The cameras were already there. What changed was what they were able to see. Instead of CCTV simply recording an incident for somebody to review later, the system is helping identify suspicious behaviour while it's still happening.

But, as always, technology is only part of the answer. It still takes trained staff and security officers to assess what is happening, decide how to respond and manage the situation properly.

The AI can spot the behaviour.
The human still has to make the judgement.

Do you think this kind of technology is the future of retail security, or are we becoming too reliant on AI to decide what looks suspicious?

20/08/2026

Sometimes the biggest security threat is not someone trying to break through the perimeter. Sometimes they already know how the site works.

Dyfed-Powys Police recently reported that a group of men had been sentenced after conspiring to steal more than £1 million worth of tin ingots from Tata Steel’s Trostre site in Llanelli.

What makes the case particularly interesting is how they were doing it. Police said a cloned security pass was used to gain access to the site, while employees helped facilitate entry and access to the warehouse. One and two-tonne blocks of tin were then loaded onto a van using a forklift.

The thefts were not taking hours either.

Investigators found individual incidents were being carried out in as little as three minutes, and the activity had been going on repeatedly over a long period before it was uncovered, and that is the real lesson here.

Access control is essential, but a working pass does not automatically mean everything is as it should be.

On large manufacturing and logistics sites, security also depends on people noticing when something does not fit the normal pattern.
Why is that vehicle arriving at that time?
Why is that person accessing the site earlier than usual?
Does the movement of stock match what should be happening?
And does the person presenting the pass actually have a legitimate reason to be there?

Technology can control access. But trained security officers add something technology cannot: judgement. They can challenge unusual activity, verify movements, check vehicles and recognise when an apparently routine situation does not quite add up.

This case is a good reminder that strong security is not only about keeping outsiders out. Sometimes it is about questioning what looks legitimate on the surface.

18/08/2026

We talk a lot about the cost of security. Perhaps we should spend more time talking about the cost of crime.

The British Chambers of Commerce recently reported that 42% of UK businesses experienced some form of crime in the past year, rising to 58% among businesses employing more than 250 people. Manufacturing was the hardest-hit sector in its research, with 50% of firms reporting business crime.
Those figures should make business leaders think.

Because the cost of crime is rarely limited to whatever was stolen or damaged.

There is the disruption afterwards. The management time. The cancelled work. The repairs. The staff concerns. The insurance implications. The operational downtime. The conversations with clients. And, in some cases, the decision to delay investment altogether.

The BCC describes crime against business as a serious barrier to growth and investment, and I think that is an important way of looking at it. Security is often challenged as a cost because it is visible on a budget.

The cost of inadequate security is much harder to see until something happens. For me, that changes the conversation.
The question should not simply be, “What will security cost us?”
It should also be: What could crime cost the business if we get this wrong?

Security will never remove every risk. But good security should reduce opportunity, improve response and give businesses the confidence to keep operating when the threat of crime is becoming increasingly difficult to ignore.

Address

Croft House St. Georges Square
Bolton
BL12HB

Telephone

+448000356607

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Leisure Guard Security - UK ltd posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Shortcuts

Share

Category