01/14/2021
“The activist tradition can be understood as the use of spatial practice to expose injustice and foster socially inclusive and politically motivated design. In an attempt to clarify and articulate the tradition, the criteria for sub-categories within the activist tradition is established according to tools, strategies, methods and intentions of activism. It considers the questions: how is activism in architecture understood and materialized? What modes of practice distinguish it from other traditions? Who has the privilege and the voice in the activist tradition? As the profession expands its gender, cultural and demographic representation, a wider range of voices are participating on behalf of those under-represented in spatial and aesthetic discourse. In politics, activism is understood as the use of direct, often confrontational action in support of a cause, whether social, political, economic or environmental. Embedded in the notion of activism is the assumption that some kind of action is necessary for structural transformation. In architecture, how this action might be practiced is as varied as its motivation. In the reconsideration of practices and agendas within the activist tradition, some have embraced a critique of the discipline’s models of practice and have offered counter-points to conventional client-based services; others are driven to redress social or economic inequalities; and still others use design-based research to reveal political, economic or logistical forces that are surreptitiously shaping our physical environment. This expanded notion offers a wider understanding of the architect as an activist agent.”
-
from "Notes on the Activist Tradition" by Lola Sheppard and Mason White in Perspecta #53, 2020.