Catch 22 - A Land Dispute

Catch 22 - A Land Dispute The loss of biodiversity will be a crime to future generations.

This land dispute has been caused by the proposal for the construction of 22 residential properties at the cost of losing 3 acres of the 1% of Scottish land which stands as the only regenerating ancient woodland in Scotland. In response to this land dispute part of Balmaha's community has set up an initiative to nurture and preserve Balmaha's natural environment: Balmaha Biodiversity Community Act

ion (BBCA). This community group is proposing a community buy-out of not just the 3 acres of woodland but the full 60 acres of woodland behind Balmaha and so move the proposed construction of the 22 residential properties to the brown field site that is already present in Balmaha.

29/04/2017

A guide to understanding the Scottish Ancient Woodland Inventory (AWI)

Summary and policy statement
This summary is intended for developers, planners, foresters, ecologists and others who need to use
the AWI in their work. It defines Ancient Woodland, briefly describes why it is important and gives the
meaning of the categories in the AWI.

Ancient Woodland
In Scotland, Ancient Woodland is defined as land that is currently wooded and has
been continually wooded, at least since 1750.
Ancient Woods are important because:

 They include all remnants of Scotland’s original woodland; their flora and fauna may
preserve elements of the natural composition of the original Atlantic forests.

 They usually have much richer wildlife than that of more recent woods.

 They preserve the integrity of soil ecological processes and associated biodiversity.

 Some have been managed by traditional methods for centuries and demonstrate an
enduring relationship between people and nature.

 Woods and veteran trees are ancient monuments whose value to the local community
and historians may be as great as that of the older buildings in a parish.

 Once destroyed, they cannot be recreated.
Although there is no legislation specifically protecting ancient woodland, Scottish Planning
Policy identifies it as an important and irreplaceable national resource that should be
protected and enhanced, as should other native and long established woodlands with high
nature conservation value. SNH will seek to use the planning system to protect ancient
woodland. The Scottish Government’s policy on control of woodland removal states that
there is a strong presumption against removing ancient semi-natural woodland or
Plantations on ancient woodland sites, amongst other types of woodland.
Other woodlands, hedgerows and individual trees, especially veteran trees, may also have
significant biodiversity value and make a significant contribution to landscape character and
quality, so should be protected from adverse impacts resulting from development.
If a development would result in the severing or impairment of connectivity between
important woodland habitats, workable mitigation measures should be identified and
implemented, potentially linked to the creation of green networks.
The Ancient Woodland Inventory is a map-based tool that shows the location of many of our
most valuable woodlands.

1
The Ancient Woodland Inventory
The Ancient Woodland Inventory (AWI) is a PROVISIONAL guide to the location of
Ancient Woodland. It contains three main categories of woodland, all of which are likely to
be of value for their biodiversity and cultural value by virtue of their antiquity:

i. Ancient Woodland (1a and 2a)
Interpreted as semi-natural woodland from maps of 1750 (1a) or 1860 (2a) and continuously
wooded to the present day. If planted with non-native species during the 20th century they
are referred to as Plantations on Ancient Woodland Sites (PAWS).

ii. Long-established woodlands of plantation origin (LEPO) (1b and 2b)
Interpreted as plantation from maps of 1750 (1b1
) or 1860 (2b) and continuously wooded
since. Many of these sites have developed semi-natural characteristics, especially the
oldest ones, which may be as rich as Ancient Woodland.

iii. Other woodlands on ‘Roy’ woodland sites (3)
Shown as unwooded on the 1st edition maps but as woodland on the Roy maps. Such sites
have, at most, had only a short break in continuity of woodland cover and may still retain
features of Ancient Woodland.

A note of caution
The AWI was derived from the Roy maps (c1750) and the OS 1st edition (c1860). It is not
definitive and should be used with care; when evaluating woods it is important to:

a) Examine the site on the ground, looking for archaeological, biological and other
indicators of antiquity and of its current biodiversity value

b) Examine old maps; the OS 1st edition and Roy maps are available on www.nls.uk.
Woods not shown on the AWI, but present on the historic maps, are likely to be
ancient and should be treated as such unless evidence is available to the contrary.

c) seek specialist advice if in doubt
Information on AWI can also be accessed form the Land Information Search (LIS) from the
Forestry Commission Scotland.

1
This category was not originally used, although the information was preserved in the database. At
digitisation these sites were reclassified as 1b (Plantation on Roy map) to recognise their greater age.

Take a wee listen :)
31/03/2017

Take a wee listen :)

Debate from Queen Elizabeth's Grammar School - Presented by Michael Buerk.

24/03/2017

The deadline to object is open till midnight. You have just over 6 hours to get your objections in. Lets make sure we build in the appropriate places !!!

a collaborative effort by 30 artists in association with the Glasgow School of Art.
23/03/2017

a collaborative effort by 30 artists in association with the Glasgow School of Art.

23/03/2017

PLEASE TAKE 20 MINUTES TO LEAVE AN OBJECTION ON THE LOCH LOMOND AND THE TROSSACHS NATIONAL PARKS WEBSITE BEFORE TOMORROW 5PM, THIS IS A CRUCIAL THING TO DO TO PRESERVE OUR SCOTTISH REGENERATING WOODLAND - LET'S MAKE SURE THAT WE BUILD IN THE APPROPRIATE PLACES.
LINK TO OBJECT:

http://eplanning.lochlomond-trossachs.org/OnlinePlanning/applicationDetails.do?activeTab=makeComment&keyVal=OINGUNSIJN100

- select comments and then make sure that you select *OBJECTION*
- an informed objection is more convincing
- don't worry if you have already submitted - you can edited and add to it before the end of Thursday

Please write an objection before the end of Thursday!

Here are relevant documents TO QUOTE in your objections + interesting read!
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/vr8c6dz9g3o5m71/AACyGyG7FX38hfbhDQF6F768a?dl=0

GREEN FIELD vs BROWN FIELDOne cannot understand why they would cut down that which is regenerating, growing and full of ...
23/03/2017

GREEN FIELD vs BROWN FIELD

One cannot understand why they would cut down that which is regenerating, growing and full of potential when there is a brown field site already present in Balmaha. Build on the brown field site. It is a matter of perspective and ability to recognise an area of natural regeneration to be as valuable as a forest filled with ancient trees. The future.

check out our blog :)
23/03/2017

check out our blog :)

Address

Balmaha

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Catch 22 - A Land Dispute posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Share