14/10/2026
Does it comply? is an important question.
But it shouldn't be the only question we ask as engineers.
A design can satisfy the relevant requirements and still leave us asking:
Is it practical to build?
Is it efficient?
Does it coordinate with the other disciplines?
Will the contractor be able to understand and implement it easily?
Does it allow for realistic construction tolerances?
Will it perform well once the building is occupied?
And have we considered what happens five, ten or twenty years down the track?
These are the questions that often sit between compliance and good design.
Engineering is full of decisions that may look straightforward on paper but have much bigger implications once they reach construction.
A structural member might technically work, but does its location create a conflict with services?
A drainage solution might meet the required performance, but have access and maintenance been considered?
A level might satisfy the design requirements, but does it create an awkward threshold, driveway transition or retaining condition elsewhere?
This is why good engineering requires more than knowing the standards.
It requires experience, communication, coordination and judgement.
The goal isn't simply to produce something that passes.
The goal is to develop a solution that is technically sound, practical to construct, coordinated with the broader design and appropriate for the people who will ultimately use and maintain it.
For me, that's one of the most important differences between designing to comply and engineering with purpose.